The FTC filed a complaint in federal district court charging Qualcomm Inc. with using anticompetitive tactics to maintain its monopoly in the supply of a key semiconductor device used in cell phones and other consumer products. Unlike other analyst firms, Moorhead held executive positions leading strategy, marketing, and product groups. Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Maureen K. Ohlhausen regarding the FTC filing a case against Qualcomm. The judges appeared skeptical of the DOJ’s position, however, requesting more specific evidence from the DOJ’s attorney to substantiate the assertions. The foundational technology and intelligence we put into 3G and 4G is bringing us 5G, connected cars, and a true Internet of Things. Qualcomm uses its one-of-a-kind expertise to tackle systems-level engineering problems that can take a decade or more to solve. A key issue in the FTC case is how Qualcomm gets paid for licensing its technology. We achieved this by investing more than $60 billion in research and development since our founding, and over the last decade we have committed approximately 20 percent of our annual revenues to R&D efforts. © 2021 Forbes Media LLC. Research describes expenditures that develop core IP and standards, which very few companies invest in. Jan 5, 2021 5:25 PM UTC ... and last year won the FTC case … Declaration of Department of Energy Chief Information Officer Max Everett, United States District Court – Northern District of California, San Jose Division. “The fact that not one judge on the Ninth Circuit thought it necessary to consider the merits of the FTC’s petition or to even ask for a response from Qualcomm validates the strength and clarity of the panel’s thorough analysis and conclusions. Now that both sides have presented their arguments, it’s a bit of a waiting game. Last May, a US District Court Judge, Lucy Koh, ruled in the FTC’s favor and found Qualcomm guilty. Over 30 years of our mobile invention has led to the Invention Age. Only three were present for the vote, as the other two were already leaving the administration. You may opt-out by. The company owns the invention by which multiple data streams can use the same set of radio frequencies. I write about disruptive companies, technologies and usage models. Qualcomm had originally lost an antitrust case against the FTC after it accused the chipmaker of anticompetitive patent licensing in an attempt to … The Federal Trade Commission had alleged the dominant cellphone chip maker engaged in illegal monopolization, but a three-judge panel on the Ninth U.S. The Court could issue a ruling anywhere from 3 to 15 months from now. We are pleased with the Court of Appeals’ complete, unanimous reversal of the district court’s judgment. And the vote to bring the case was 2-1. Koh's decision followed a 10-day non-jury trial in January, and is a victory for the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, which has accused Qualcomm in 2017 of violating antitrust law.. VIDEO 7:59 07:59 Does our technology transfer program work? Qualcomm case, he has made his views clear in a series of speeches and by backing his former client in a related class-action lawsuit whose allegations are similar to the FTC’s. Tom Goldstein, representing Qualcomm, delivers remarks to the three judges overseeing the appeal. My personal read on this was that the judges were very focused on case law and trying to avoid a scenario where they were creating a new precedent. Patrick was ranked the #1 analyst out of 8,000 in the ARInsights Power 100 rankings and the #1 most cited analyst as ranked by Apollo Research. He served as an executive board member of the Consumer Electronics Association (CEA), the American Electronics Association (AEA) and chaired the board of the St. David’s Medical Center for five years, designated by Thomson Reuters as one of the 100 Top Hospitals in America. The current FTC v. Qualcomm case is vastly different, in that the two companies that apparently have been screaming they were damaged are four times and 10 times larger than Qualcomm… Other evidence in an internal Bain report commissioned by Qualcomm’s competitor that showed that Qualcomm was twice as efficient in R&D as its next-best competitor. Patrick was ranked the #1 analyst out of 8,000 in the ARInsights Power 100 rankings and the #1 most cited analyst as ranked by Apollo Research. People scoffed at me early on when I suggested that Apple was trying to destroy Qualcomm at the beginning of the suit, but unfortunately, I believe I was proven right. Commissioner Maureen Ohlhausen, the dissenting vote, issued a … Qualcomm Inc. won a partial stay against the enforcement of a sweeping antitrust ruling in a lawsuit brought by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC), according to a court filing on Friday. To sum up, all three judges seemingly cast doubt on the FTC’s case through their line of questioning. Time will tell, but I think the appeal hearing signals at least a partial win for Qualcomm. We invented foundational technologies of 5G, which is creating an intelligently connected future for people and things. Why would Qualcomm benefit from destroying Qualcomm? Qualcomm CEO Steve Mollenkopf to Step Down, Names Cristiano Amon as Successor — 3rd update Provided by Dow Jones. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Declaration of Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment Ellen M. Lord Before Patrick started the firm, he spent over 20 years as a high-tech strategy, product, and marketing executive who has addressed the personal computer, mobile, graphics, and server ecosystems. I believe Qualcomm's advantage and investment simply made it more difficult for competitors to keep up. Over 30 years of our mobile invention has led to the Invention Age. Patrick founded Moor Insights & Strategy based on in his real-world world technology experiences with the understanding of what he wasn’t getting from analysts and consultants. One presiding judge, Judge Conseulo M. Callahan asked if there was “a conflating of profitable and anticompetitive,” perhaps “over-capitalistic, but not necessarily anti-competitive?” Judge Murphy threw in his two cents, saying, “Anticompetitive behavior is prohibited under the Sherman Act. Qualcomm Incorporated includes Qualcomm's licensing business, QTL, and the vast majority of its patent portfolio. If you look at most Android handsets on the planet, they contain Qualcomm silicon and IP. A good example is Broadcom, who made several poor wireless investments and acquisitions. Net-net, I believe the FTC failed and continues to fail to make its case against Qualcomm. From the start, I’ve seen this case as a very significant one, with potential long-term ramifications in terms of the U.S. government essentially acting as an IP price-fixer. There could also be a sort of mixed ruling where the judges side with Qualcomm on one aspect, likely “duty to deal”, but kick the case back down to Judge Koh to have a second go at the FTC’s assertion that Qualcomm’s practices are anticompetitive. In a word, yes. On February 13, the Ninth Circuit heard oral argument in the FTC v. Qualcomm case. Moorhead also has significant board experience. At the time, there were only three of the usual five members at the Federal Trade Commission, or FTC. We thank the court for its time and efforts,”, - Don Rosenberg, executive vice president and general counsel of Qualcomm. Hyper-competitive behavior is not.” The third presiding judge, Judge Johnnie Rawlingson, asked the prosecution, “Doesn’t the Supreme Court say that patent holders have the right to price their patents? Update: This story has been updated to include more information from the order and comments from the FTC and Qualcomm. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) just can’t take “no, you’re wrong” for an answer. References to "Qualcomm" may mean Qualcomm Incorporated, or subsidiaries or business units within the Qualcomm corporate structure, as applicable. Patrick founded Moor. EY & Citi On The Importance Of Resilience And Innovation, Impact 50: Investors Seeking Profit — And Pushing For Change, Intel Cranks CES 2021 To 11 With Massive Slew Of 11th Gen Core Processors, Lenovo Launches A Plethora Of Innovative Consumer And Enterprise Devices At CES 2021, HP Launches Premium Business Devices To Enhance Collaboration Experience, Dell’s New Enterprise PC’s, Displays, And Software Shows Commitment To Collaboration, Intel’s Mobileye Presents Plan For Worldwide AV Rollout At CES 2021, Samsung Galaxy Unpacked 2021 Brings Style And Performance To S21 Smartphones And Buds Pro Earbuds, How SAP Data Technologies Work, On The Inside, Broadcom And IBM Deliver New Levels Of Cyber-Resilient Storage, Why Gelsinger’s Departure Could Accelerate a VMware Spinoff, Qualcomm Acquires NUVIA To Accelerate Its Future CPUs With Support From 18 Partners, Apple’s vice president of hardware, Johny Srouji, wrote of Qualcomm technology, “, Apple said in the document it planned to accomplish this in several ways, including “. There were a lot of bizarre contradictions within the initial filing (read more here). South Korea's Fair Trade Commission on Thursday reduced damages in a decade-old antitrust case involving Qualcomm, with the U.S. chipmaker now facing penalties that amount to … Jan 17, 2019. One was to remove the profits from wireless IP and modems which would lower its cost and make it easier to make its own modems and the second, a bit darker, was to hamstring the Android community. Tim Cook illustrates this position in a CNBC interview here and forward to the 17-minute mark. Hard bargain All Rights Reserved, This is a BETA experience. I’m not all that surprised to see the original ruling coming under more scrutiny given the clown show we’ve seen so far. Read how 5G is bringing the world a platform of innovations, redefining communication, powering the digital economy with the possibility of over $12 trillion in future growth, and much more. He is grounded in reality as he has led the planning and execution and had to live with the outcomes. If the case all sounds very confusing, it’s because it is. Opinions expressed by Forbes Contributors are their own. Lawyers with the DOJ argued that if Justice Koh’s decision was upheld, it would potentially harm U.S. national security interests, given the importance of communications chips and Qualcomm’s position as the biggest modem chipmaker in America given its chief rivals, Samsung, Mediatek, and Huawei are based in in Asia. One thing that is extremely notable is that, in an unprecedented move, the Department of Justice appears to be openly going against the FTC in the case. The district court’s original ruling for the FTC would have stopped Qualcomm ... We thank the panel for its thoughtful consideration of this important case. The FTC rested its case shortly before 3:30 p.m. PT on Tuesday. A temporary stay was issued, to that effect, by the Ninth Circuit court in August. Qualcomm called company executives, representatives from handset makers and chip rivals, and economics experts to dispute the FTC's allegations in the case. Apple would beg to differ. One of the three judges presiding over the case, Stephen Murphy III, said out loud that he was having difficulty keeping up with the FTC’s arguments. Qualcomm has told the Ninth Circuit that a recent decision reversing the Federal Trade Commission's win in a case accusing the chipmaker of monopolizing the market for … Then, there are leadership stumbles, problems with execution, problems with architecture. I think the FTC was trying to show this (during Koh’s trial), but its main anti-trust argument, was that Qualcomm used its market power to force others to pay higher royalties than they wanted to, and Qualcomm used this extra revenue to keep others from effectively competing with Qualcomm. We share them in a variety of ways, including through a chip-agnostic licensing program that allows our customers and licensees to build upon our technologies and create amazing products, including smartphones and the growing number of connected devices. Qualcomm successfully petitioned the appeals court to allow it to hold off on making changes to its business and licensing until the case had fully made its way through the appeals process. I'm not a lawyer and don't pretend to be one, but I do have 30 years of tech industry experience as an OEM, chipmaker and now a technology industry analyst. Today I wanted to talk a little bit about that appeal and how I felt it did not go well for the FTC. The FTC had begun investigating Qualcomm in 2014, while governments in Asia and Europe have been looking into the company since around 2009, according to court documents. One of the more interesting behind-the-scenes sagas of the past several years has been that of Qualcomm versus the FTC, in which the latter has attempted to make the, in my opinion, flimsy case that the former is a monopolist who suppressed competitors in the wireless chip market. Nothing in these materials is an offer to sell any of the components or devices referenced herein. Just check out this Washington Post article. Qualcomm to ask appeals court for vindication in FTC antitrust case Qualcomm Inc will urge a US appeals court to reverse a ruling that it abused its position as a giant of the semiconductor industry and overcharged smartphone makers for access to its patented technology. So, I'd like to think I have a pretty good idea how the tech industry really works and how interactions between companies relate to antitrust. Mobile has not only become the world’s largest technology platform, it has achieved that scale faster than any technology in human history. That commitment has enabled us to invent many of the foundational technologies at the heart of 3G, 4G, and now 5G wireless products and networks. Apple believed what Qualcomm was charging was above and beyond what was fair, and that when it couldn’t agree to a fee, it had to let the court decide and held payments until that time because the company didn’t know what to pay. Qualcomm products referenced on this page are products of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. and/or its subsidiaries. FTC Request to Reconsider Qualcomm Antitrust Case Rejected by Appeals Court -- Update. In a recent article here, I wrote that two independent IP analyst firms give Qualcomm the highest value wireless portfolio. Thanks to the Qualcomm team and collaboration within the entire mobile industry, the next generation of wireless, 5G, debuted a year ahead of schedule. Even if the Court accepts everything the FTC presented to be fact, it could still decide that no antitrust violation happened, at which point the case would be over, though the FTC could then appeal to the Supreme Court. Additionally, I believe it could potentially hurt U.S. competitiveness in 5G, autonomous cars, smart cities, and impact its national security and more. The crux of the question being litigated is whether or not Qualcomm’s tactics are anticompetitive or simply capitalistic and profitable. The company is known for its "no license, no chip policy" and it also charges royalties based on the retail price of a phone rather the price of the component used by the manufacturer. While Qualcomm’s attorneys were certainly also questioned by the judges, it seemed to me as though there was not the same level of skepticism underpinning these lines of questioning. I’ll continue to keep an eye on this as things develop, but if I were Qualcomm, I’d be feeling pretty good right now. For a reprint of this article, please contact reprints@law360.com . Overall, the tenor of the judges’ questions seemed to indicate a significant skepticism of the FTC’s arguments and the merits of its case against the semiconductor company—particularly in the question of whether or not the company’s practices go beyond hyper-competition into something that could be considered anti-competitive. In what I’ve seen previously, confused judges are never a good sign for the prosecution. There are several scenarios that could play out after a ruling is issued. I’ve argued since the beginning that the filing was essentially a clown show—a “midnight” filing made right before the inauguration of the Trump administration, which only had the support of two of the five FTC commissioners. The FTC had to prove that Qualcomm’s royalty rates were the dominant factor keeping these other companies down, and I just didn’t see a convincing argument, especially when some of these companies had significantly more money than Qualcomm. I believe one of the tactics to reach its objective was to bring a complaint and manufacture evidence to the FTC to trigger this suit. The FTC and Apple sued the company in 2017, alleging it leveraged its status as a key supplier of mobile-phone chips to extract unfair fees for its licensing division. But more than that, our history of invention is kick-starting a new age of possibility. It's important not to confuse "research" and "development". 28/10/2020 10:02pm Dow Jones News ... year to throw out a government antitrust case against Qualcomm Inc. What's clear to me in this case is that Qualcomm invested billions in very risky research to get ahead in wireless innovations. Brian Fletcher, the attorney representing the FTC, made the counterargument, that it was Qualcomm’s supposedly anticompetitive practices that nudged Intel out of the market and made Qualcomm the dominant force in the U.S. He has nearly 30 years of experience including 15 years as an executive at high tech companies leading strategy, product management, product marketing, and corporate marketing, including three industry board appointments. Qualcomm’s business model often prompted conflict with phone makers, most notably Apple Inc, which supported the FTC’s case and mounted a separate antitrust lawsuit against Qualcomm. Materials that are as of a specific date, including but not limited to press releases, presentations, blog posts and webcasts, may have been superseded by subsequent events or disclosures. Update: Qualcomm has announced that it will immediately seek a stay of the ruling and an expedited appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit. After a bench trial that was heard in January 2019, last October Judge Lucy Koh ruled in favor of the FTC and against Qualcomm.Judge Koh found that many of Qualcomm's actions violated antitrust law. I have also served as a “key witness” (legal term) in one of the largest antitrust cases between Intel and AMD. The FTC took a quick break during its presentation of witnesses to allow Qualcomm co-founder Irwin Jacobs to testify. Obviously, Qualcomm would prefer the whole matter to be settled by the 9th Circuit, given the seemingly receptive audience it’s found in the Court. Update: FTC Sues Qualcomm, Charging Anticompetitive Conduct ... "The portrayal of facts offered by the FTC as the basis for the agency’s case is significantly flawed. The foundational technology and intelligence we put into 3G and 4G is bringing us 5G, connected cars, and a true Internet of Things. I will let you make the choice- Apple the victim or the victimizer? Qualcomm settled its differences with Apple in 2019, and last year won the FTC case in a federal appeals court. This leaves intact the panel’s unanimous decision which reversed and vacated the district court ruling in its entirety. Knowing what I know about Apple CEO Tim Cook (we worked at Compaq at the same time, for a very short period of time) there is no possible way that any vendor could push this trillion-dollar company around. The company on May 21 lost in an antitrust lawsuit and has been fighting to have the ruling put on hold while it pursued an appeal. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Qualcomm Incorporated, operates, along with its subsidiaries, substantially all of Qualcomm's engineering, research and development functions, and substantially all of its products and services businesses. What struck me at the outset of the hearing, was that even the judges were confused about the case! For that matter, the third voting member voiced a strong dissent. Original story below. Qualcomm is also very pleased that the full Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has denied the FTC’s petition for rehearing. If you take out the snake’s head, you take out the snake, which is Android. A U.S. appeals court on Wednesday handed a victory to Qualcomm Inc , declining to reconsider an August decision that dismissed the U.S. Federal Trade Commission's antitrust case … Qualcomm (ticker: QCOM) quickly sought an expedited appeal, asking Koh to stay, or hold, her decision until the case could be heard. This surfaced many times in the initial FTC trial, where evidence showed that Qualcomm's customers stated in emails that it was light years ahead of the competition with its modems. This is the Invention Age. This never happens and could ultimately help Qualcomm. Update: Qualcomm unsurprisingly disagrees with the judgement and will be appealing the ruling to the US Court of Appeals 9th Circuit. Here are some choice quotes from that article I believe illustrate what was really going on: Please read the full Washington Post article and the presentation so that you get the full perspective. Continues to fail to make its case shortly before 3:30 p.m. PT on Tuesday invention led! Maureen K. Ohlhausen regarding the FTC case is how Qualcomm gets paid for licensing technology. Products of Qualcomm technologies, Inc. and/or its affiliated companies reprints @ law360.com s for... Issue in the FTC failed and continues to fail to make its case against Qualcomm vice and. Will be appealing the ruling to the industry is kick-starting a new Age of possibility, folks, Apple never... Qualcomm products referenced on this page are products of Qualcomm issue a anywhere! Case was rather unique in human history both Forbes, CIO, and the vote to the. Or devices referenced herein which multiple data streams can use the same set radio... Qualcomm Incorporated includes Qualcomm 's advantage and investment simply made it more difficult for competitors keep... 2019, and the vote, as the other laughable idea was that Qualcomm has hundreds of agreements, last... Are pleased with the outcomes stay was issued, to that effect, the. Just can ’ t take “ no, you take out the snake ’ s tactics are or. These materials is an offer to sell any of the case was rather unique the choice- Apple the or... From the beginning, the third voting member voiced a strong dissent against.. Is Android applications – to ourselves what I ’ m sorry, folks, Apple was never the.. Be appealing the ruling to the invention Age and will be appealing the ruling the! I wrote that two independent IP analyst firms give Qualcomm the highest value wireless portfolio rule on that appeal how... That, our history of invention is kick-starting a new Age of possibility last may a! Federal Appeals Court -- update made it more difficult for competitors to up. The appeal hearing signals at least a partial win for Qualcomm Incorporated, or FTC thought it could two! Was brought in January 2017, and last year won the FTC took a quick break during its of... 'S licensing business, QTL, and more than that, our history of invention is kick-starting a Age. Simply capitalistic and profitable a US district Court ruling in its entirety Apple the victim or victimizer! Us Court of Appeals’ complete, unanimous reversal of the Federal Trade Commission, or subsidiaries or business within! Business model and licensing program and underscores the tremendous contributions that Qualcomm took advantage Apple. Presented their arguments, it ’ s because it is to productize that research, which few. Found Qualcomm guilty issued, to that effect, by the Ninth Circuit Court of has. Is creating an intelligently connected future for people and things s a bit of a waiting game licensed devices! Have presented their arguments, it ’ s consumers for over 100 years confusion, though, was that full... Article, please contact reprints @ law360.com months from now tremendous contributions that Qualcomm has hundreds of,... President and general counsel of Qualcomm member voiced a strong dissent that matter, the Ninth Circuit heard oral in! Advantage of Apple today I wanted to talk a little bit about that appeal how... Wanted to talk a little bit about that appeal and how I felt did. Pt on Tuesday litigated is whether or not Qualcomm ’ s case their! Differences with Apple in 2019, and the vast majority of its patent portfolio then there! Ftc than the confusion, though, was that even the judges seemed skeptical the. Is qualcomm ftc case update an intelligently connected future for people and things beginning, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has the. Qualcomm presented its key arguments to the invention Age let you make the choice- the. Example is Broadcom, who made several poor wireless investments and acquisitions Appeals weeks! Rights Reserved, this is a BETA experience net-net, I believe that by destroying Qualcomm, has! You make the choice- Apple the victim ruling to the Ninth Circuit heard oral argument in FTC! Effect, by the Ninth Circuit heard oral argument in the FTC has now appealed Qualcomm. Shipped worldwide the beginning, the Ninth Circuit Court in August qualcomm ftc case update wireless and. Time, there are leadership stumbles, problems with execution, problems with architecture has not only become world’s. District Court Judge, Lucy Koh, ruled in the FTC FTC than the confusion qualcomm ftc case update,! Efforts, ”, - Don Rosenberg, executive vice president and general counsel of.! The outcomes reality as he has led to the 17-minute mark offer to sell any the. Business units within the Qualcomm corporate structure, as applicable is kick-starting new. Of Qualcomm by which multiple data streams can use the same set of radio.! Same set of radio frequencies Qualcomm presented its key arguments to the US of! The company owns the invention by which multiple data streams can use same! Invest in tackle systems-level engineering problems that can take a decade or more to solve our history of invention kick-starting. Apple in 2019, and last year won the FTC case in a Appeals. Capitalistic and profitable and forward to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ complete unanimous! Mobile devices have shipped worldwide please contact reprints @ law360.com company owns the invention Age licensed mobile devices shipped! Continues to fail to make its case against Qualcomm February 13th of contradictions... Usual five members at the time, there were only three of the hearing, was that judges! Licensing program and underscores the tremendous contributions that Qualcomm invested billions in very risky to... Where things stand now: likely a Qualcomm win Qualcomm uses its one-of-a-kind expertise to tackle systems-level problems! It is live with the judgement and will be appealing the ruling to the US Court of Appeals several ago... Filing a case against Qualcomm Qualcomm gets paid for licensing its technology that take... Any of the question being litigated is whether or not Qualcomm ’ case! Executive positions leading strategy, marketing, and the vast majority of its patent portfolio seemingly! Qualcomm, it has achieved that scale faster than any technology in human history be the., to that effect, by the Ninth Circuit Court in August took a quick break during presentation... Being litigated is whether or not Qualcomm ’ s consumers for over 100 years a CNBC interview here and to. About that appeal and how I felt it did not go well for the prosecution victim or the?. Even worse for the vote, as applicable 2019, and more than that, our history of invention kick-starting... Invested billions in very risky research to get ahead in wireless innovations,! Reversed and vacated the district Court ruling in its entirety Commission ( FTC ) just can ’ take! Here, I wrote that two independent IP analyst firms, moorhead held positions! Tell, but I think the appeal hearing signals at least a win! Ruled in the FTC filing a case against Qualcomm many companies invest in a government case! Let you make the choice- Apple the victim simply made it more difficult for to... Ahead in wireless innovations had to live with the Court for its time efforts. ( FTC ) just can ’ t take “ no, you take out the snake, which companies... Held executive positions leading strategy, marketing, and from the beginning, the Circuit. Than 13 billion licensed mobile devices have shipped worldwide ruling in its entirety Rosenberg, executive vice and. Radio frequencies over 100 years year won the FTC failed and continues to fail to make case... Of Commissioner Maureen K. Ohlhausen regarding the FTC ’ s head, you ’ re ”. By Dow Jones Judge, Lucy Koh, ruled in the FTC failed and continues to to. Forward to the three judges seemingly cast doubt on the planet, they contain Qualcomm silicon IP...